Pushing the Boundaries Together

David and I were approached by Emergent Village to write a post for their blog. It is reproduced below for our NG.AC friends. Enjoy (and critique):

http://www.emergentvillage.com/weblog/park-pushing-boundaries

===================

David: The joke goes something like this: when a Japanese person goes to a new city, he looks to start a business; when a Chinese person first arrives in a new place, he looks to start a restaurant; but when a Korean comes to town, he’s going to start a church. As my Korean immigrant father is a recently retired pastor who planted or shepherded at least seven churches that I can count, I can attest to the above punchline—Koreans love church. And we’ve taken to church planting and the Christian industry by storm, a sort of ecclesiological Kim Yunah phenomenon for those of you who watched the Winter Olympics. Continue reading

what the Gospel looks like in Taiwan

Missiologist and researcher Ed Stetzer (and a group of pastors) are on a Taiwan vision trip. They’ve observed several things that make the Gospel obviously and visibly different than what the Gospel looks like in a typical mostly-Caucasian majority-culture American evangelical context.

upstream-banner

Ed blogs in Ancestor Worship and Taiwanese Christians about an interview with Robert Young in this video — Contextual Response to Ancestral Worship (7:37)

And, this video in blog entry, Meeting and Learning from Pastor Chen (6:18)

Does this suggest that the Gospel should look differently among Asian Americans?

In this blog post, I’m using the term “Gospel” broadly, in the sense of how the Gospel and its implications is lived out in particular contexts of an ethnic and/or racial grouping. And in so exploring and forming, even the language and terms used to explain the explicit and implicit theologies may need adaptation too.

How intergenerational worship can be creative and inclusive

The Next Gener.Asian Church conversation kicks off with David Park talking about his and Dan Ra‘s experience at the 12th annual Korean Worship & Music Conference.

Listen to this conversation (running time=14:17 min; powered by podOmatic)::

This was the first time that this conference had an English track, and it was fascinating to hear how the Korean-speaking and English-speaking could harmoniously worship with one another and learn from one another.

A post-racial church for the next generation

Can a church become post-racial?” Efrem Smith tackles this question over at Theooze.TV:

The embedded video is a preview. Watch the full video at Theooze.TV, and see the discussion already going at the comment thread there.

Also see this response to this video was posted at the Storrs Community Church blog (the church is located in Storrs, Connecticut):

… My immediate response to seeing the question, “Can the church become post-racial?”, was one of frustration that we are bandying about the wrong word and at the wrong time, when every well-being statistic you can look at across the country shows extreme white privilege and a sizable racial/ethnic gap. This is not by chance. It shows up in almost every category. And its a direct result of slavery and our policy making and community building that favored Whites over anyone else. It’s most likely not intentional racism from anyone nowadays, but racial inequity nonetheless.

… The church is not separate from culture, but quite collusive historically. Hence, we see similar inequities within. We’re not talking about overt, Jim Crow racism (i.e., race relations), but rather the scaffolding in our communities, however unseen to some/many.

Emerging Church in Korean

The book by Ryan Bolger and Eddie Gibbs, Emerging Churches: Creating Christian Community in Postmodern Cultures, is now available in Korean!
Emerging Churches, in Korean
Link to the Korean online bookstore where the book’s for sale.

Curious how Koreans in South Korea, and in the United States, would read this book to join the conversations, and what emerging churches in a Korean context would look like.

Fellowship of American Chinese Evangelicals newsletters online

Worship services and churches for the next generation, and even English ministries, were not all that common in ethnic Asian churches back in the days.

One factor that likely contributed towards the development of English ministries within the Chinese/ Asian church was an organization called FACE, the Fellowship of American Chinese Evangelicals, which started:

… at the 1978 NACOCE [North America Congress of Chinese Evangelicals] congress, the Fellowship of American Chinese Evangelicals (FACE) was born, sounding a call for “parallel ministries” for American and Canadian born Chinese in the Chinese church. Today, American born Chinese ministries, and the broader challenge of planting Asian-American churches, are an accepted part of the ministry scene in North America. [a]

About Face
They published a quarterly newsletter from 1979 to 2003 called “About FACE”. According to the first issue, The Fellowship of American Chinese Evangelicals is a ministry established by four American-Born Chinese (ABC) participants of NACOCE and encouraged by NACOCE to enable the whole Chinese Church to be more effective in ministry to ABCs. The “About FACE” newsletters have been made available online for free download at www.mediafire.com/aboutface.

Browse this spreadsheet for an index of “About FACE” article titles, authors, and topics.

Browse through those ol’ newsletters and find historical artifacts and insights that may be quite informative to the conversations going on here. How’s that saying go: Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it?

Questions from the Asian North American (ANA) Consultation – Plenary 1

Linda Cannell led an exercise entitled “World Cafe”. Here are some of the questions that the various tables came up.

Why the Exodus and Why the Return?

How do we grow healthy churches as ANA? Is it related to ethnicity/ identity formation? Or are there other critical factors?

How do we raise healthy leaders who are true to the gospel and to their ANA identity?

How does our ANA identity and the gospel relate to one another?

We are seeing a reversal of the “silent exodus? but need to better understand what is driving it.

How does our explicit theology become aligned with our implicit theology?

Is there a distinct ANA theology? How does that affect people who are bi/multi cultural?

What are the implication of what 2040 will look like?

Is there a correlation between identity and mission (or is it past experience?)

Challenge the assumption that the movement of 2nd+ generation to go from ethnic church to Anglo church back to ethnic church is uniform.

What is our working definition of “household” and “family” because there are aspects of ANA understanding of “household that need redeeming.

What is Asian Identity?

Just a few initial thoughts.

Until It Sticks

In one of my previous lives, I worked as a the sales/marketing director of a Korean soccer company trying to make entry into the US market (and here’s the defunct website-unchanged since 2003).

We realized (by we, I mean everyone except the guy in charge) early on that the company was underfunded and ill-prepared to enter the competitive US market. For instance, they didn’t have US shoe sizing down properly, weren’t spec’ed for US apparel regulations, and had severely underestimated marketing costs in the US. And we realized it early on. I would say by week 2, but the executive director was in denial. We did enough market research to know that Nike and Adidas had a menacing presence on the soccer market and had correctly diagnosed the fact that the MLS was going to grow with or without Beckham, and already at the youth and college level, soccer was multi-billion dollar industry.

But even though we knew it, we set out on our little version of Iraq anyway. We got warehouse space, developed brochures, had samples sent in, met with buyers, spoke with media outlets, went to national conferences, courted big box chains as well as the omnipresent Eurosport. We talked to everyone we could think of at every level in any corner of the country. But nothing stuck.

And when myself and my coworker were very low in morale and having seen the writing on the wall since week 2, we begged the director to stop and reconsider. What was he waiting for?

He replied at length about how Koreans were known for their passion and determination. He talked about the will of the Korean people who rose up from the ashes of the Japanese occupation and the Korean War. He referenced Hyundai and Samsung once laughingstocks now leading a diverse array of markets and way ahead of technology in America. In his best dramatic tone (closely modeled off of Keanu Reeves I think in retrospect), he said that Korean blood ran through our veins though we were born in America and we must never say die. Even the most ludicrous, absurd goal, Koreans have the power to achieve it. If what we’re doing right now isn’t working, try something else. And if that doesn’t work, try something else. We try and try until it sticks. But if we keep at it, one day it will work.

When I pressed him for a vision, a strategy, a plan, he just shrugged. We can do whatever – whatever works, he replied. He made it sound like a position of strength, like “We can do anything. Anything is possible.” I remember thinking, wow, you have absolutely no idea…

I lasted about ten months before I quit. But like I said, from where I was sitting, he was way in over his head before week 2.

The thing that remains with me is the haunting feeling that the director really believed what he thought about the tireless Korean spirit. Did he really just expect good things to happen even when he had no real plan or strategy? Did he expect Nike and Adidas to do a double take at this no-name brand that was virtually unknown even in its country of origin? Sorry, I forgot that they sponsored the national team of Bahrain one year. My bad.

Seriously though, after serving at a Korean church not long after, I remember hearing some similar things from the senior pastor there, well, except that the language was spiritualized. Is it true that Koreans just have a sense of “let’s just throw stuff around until it sticks” mentality?

Do Korean American pastors really think this is just going to work itself out? Silent exodus, whatever. Multi-ethnic churches, sure. We can do it all. Let’s try this and oh, I heard that other church down the street is doing such and such. Why don’t we try to do that. And I heard there’s a good speaker, let’s get a praise night together, oh and I heard coffee shops and bean bags are in,  oh, you’re right we should get more socially active now, blah bob lob law…

Really? Just throw whatever around, huh?

What’s In A Name?

This is from a post on the great blog, dashhouse.com about dropping denominational labels. I guess my tweak on this would be to simply ask what does it mean if we were to drop the ethnic labels as well? What does it mean for us to have “Korean” or “Chinese” in the name of the church when we have very little sense of ethnic identity ourselves? I think the denominational labels reflect our own ignorance of the differences behind those labels. Perhaps we drop them to attract others, but also perhaps the omission reflects that we do not know ourselves. By the same token then, if we’re dropping our ethnic labels to make ourselves more multi-ethnic or more open, perhaps we underestimate the sense that merely being a church, regardless of what the doctrine is or what ethnicity the people are inside, has become unattractive to people who aren’t Christian. And our willingness to drop these labels just shows that we are still preoccupied with the wrong notion of church to begin with.

Here’s just a clip of the aforementioned post…

There was a trend in the 90s up until today to drop denominational labels from church names. A church would become a community church or just church period. So, in our case, we would drop Baptist and become Richview Community Church or just Richview Church.

The thinking behind this is that Baptist is a bit of a turnoff. So is Presbyterian, Alliance, Anglican, or whatever.

The problem today is that people aren\’t turned off by the type of church. They aren’t staying away because it\’s a particular type of church. It’s more that church isn’t on their radar. As Reggie McNeal said, you can build the perfect church and they still won’t come.

In fact, the labels are increasingly meaningless. They used to carry baggage; now people just aren’t sure what they even mean.

The example I use is of a vegan passing by a fast food joint. Inside the restaurant, they’re very concerned that everyone know they’re McDonalds and not Burger King. But to the vegan walking by, McDonalds is the same as Burger King. There may be differences, but the differences don’t matter to a vegan. He’s simply not interested.

I Talk Too Much

So, the weekend in Chattanooga was really a great experience — with over a hundred Asian American students from all over the SouthEast.

EMERGE 2007 was a really well-organized (no thanks to the Sheraton hotel) conference and had a great balance of small group intimacy (I loved my guys — props to Micah, Nick, Tim, and Richard) and large group worship (biggie ups to Jacob, Josh, Ray, and Matt).  Tom Lin blew us away with his simple, authentic approach to following Jesus and living that risky life.

Despite my sleep deprived state and sinus infection, I pulled together my first seminar entitled, “You Are The Future Of The Asian American Church” (Click for the presentation).

Beforehand, I really thought that there would be no way that I could go the entire 60-75 minutes for the workshop, but I really found myself trying to cram down tons of information  in the twenty-five minutes or so on top of some wonderful conversations. I was talking a mile a minute towards the end there….starting to sound like I was auctioning churches off, not help any survive.

Almost thirty students attended my workshop and they were really experts on diagnosing some of the problems in the Asian church —  divisions over language; lack of resources; inability to collaborate across ethnic lines; intergenerational walls; lack of input from young adults; lack of involvement with the surrounding communities; and even questioning the validity of an Asian American church. I was really encouraged with the depth and maturity of their critique as well as their hunger for some good constructive answers.

We’ll have a “TalkBack” conference call on this subject later this month, but hopefully the presentation notes will help generate some more food for thought. Til then…